Piatok, 24. november, 2017 | Meniny má Emília

Načítavam, moment...
Momentálne nie ste prihlásený

Pentagon: "Saddám s al-Kájdou nič nemal" (Späť na článok)

Pridajte priamu reakciu k článku

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... > >>

Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

Jan

Ako vzdy K+++++
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

K+

toto som si nakreslil na tricko, ked zacala vojna.. http://zionmag.org/take/obrazky/imgs/vojna.jpg bolo to frustrujuce pozerat sa na to ako usa prevalcovala aj osn s nejakym smiesnymi fotkami a vobec vsetko a vsetkych.. rozmyslal som ci sa v zaujme dobrej veci moze klamat.. lenze jednak si myslim, ze by sa nemalo, z principu, a po druhe tu nejde o dobru vec ani zdaleka.. spime v ohni
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

 

Skvely clanok,. Bohvie kde je koniec tych exponatov z bagdadskych muzei, v ktorej rodine americkych milardardarov skocili?
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

Ked pracovnik BBC

videl, ako sa rozkrada muzem v Bagdade, tak ziadal americkych vojakov, aby zabranili rabovacke, ale oni odpovedali, ze teraz sa musia starat o ministerstvo hospodatsrstva, aby zaistli dokumenty o tazbe ropy, bolo to odvysielane na BBC World, ak by zase niektora modra tupa hlava tvrdila opak
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

na tupu hlavu

sa pozri do zrkadla, fakty su poruke bez problemu:

Take a look at this short excerpt from Marine Col. Matthew Bogdanos’ new book, "Thieves of Baghdad."

Bogdanos, chief investigator of the April 10-12, 2003, looting of the Iraq National Museum, explodes the myth that U.S. forces in Baghdad were quick to secure the Oil Ministry building, but they cared so little about the museum they let looters empty it of all its artifacts.

On Page 202, he says:

Some critics made a big deal about how we protected the oil ministry, but not the museum. What they failed to take into account is that to "secure" a building in combat, you usually have to physically occupy it, at least temporarily. If the building is fortified, that means a battle. In this comparison, there are three facts that such critics blithely ignored.

First, the "securing" of the oil ministry began with U.S. air strikes on April 9. It was a lawful target, and we dropped a bomb on it. We were not going to bomb the museum.

Second, the oil ministry did not contain soldiers – it had not been turned into a fortress that housed people who were trying to kill us. The museum was filled with Republican Guards shooting at Americans with automatic weapons and tank-killer rocket-propelled grenades.

Finally, the oil ministry is just one building – the coalition "captured" it in less than an hour. The museum was an eleven-acre complex of interconnecting and overlapping buildings and courtyards. Capturing it would have required a serious firefight that would likely have reduced the place to expensive rubble. Comparing the museum with the oil ministry, then, is comparing apples and elephants.

Case closed. The oil ministry was bombed, it contained no soldiers, it was only one building.

And by the way, looters did not remove 100 percent of the Iraq museum’s archaelogical treasures, as was reported for weeks and months. Thieves and looters took just 3.1 percent of the artifacts while U.S. troops liberated Baghdad and tried to avoid fire from Saddam Hussein’s troops within the museum compound.

Bogdanos says it took guts for the U.S. Army tank commanders not to level the museum buildings, where 100 to 150 enemy fighters were stationed illegally, and where snipers were firing AK-47s and RPGs at American GIs. A U.S. tank fired one round into an RPG position in one of the museum buildings, but then the tanks withdrew.

 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

roflol!

"The oil ministry was bombed, it contained no soldiers" - tak toto je pecka. plukovnik armady skojenych statov sa len tak mimochodom prizna k zamernemu bombardovaniu budovy v ktorej sa nenachadzali vojaci a... nic! dufam, ze sa mu ta knizka aspon predava
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

 

a to niekto z vas cakal ze s Al Kaydou budu mat Zmluvu o spolupraci ci co? A ze ti co sa tam teraz vrazdia predtym nazivali normalne?
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

 

myslim, ze schopnosti americkeho Ministerstva obrany a dalsich siahaju aj dalej ako po hladanie zmluvy. Aspon dufam, ak nie tak nas Boh ochranuj...
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

Takže vlastne je to v poriadku?

1. Keď nič nenašli, tak to znamená, že žiadna spolupráca nebola, tomu ver. Lebo aj malý náznak spojenia medzi irackým vedením a Al Kajdou by zverejnili aby nejako zlegitimizovali túto vojnu.
2. Bol som v Iraku v r 89-90, žiadna selanka, to je fakt. Normálny totalitný režim prešpikovaný udavačmi, takže viacmenej spolunažívanie pod tvrdou rukou. Žiadna občianska vojna.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

 

no kedze Usama udajne ponukol svoju pomoc Kuvajtu proti Iraku po obsadeni (Kuvajt uprednostnil pomoc USA) tak asi tazko sa da povazovat Irak za spojenca Al-Kaidy. A mimochodom Irak bol na rozdiel od Iranu viac menej sekularny stat bez islamskeho prava Saria a Saddam kludne katoval islamskych duchovnych ked sa mu nepozdavali takze urcite s al-kaidov neboli velky kamarati..
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

sudruh bloger

ty v tom mas este viac jasno ako sudruh Cepicka blahej pamati. Len nepouzivaj take dlhe suvetia, aby ti masy porozumeli. Cest.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

radsej

napis co nepravdive napisal.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

na zaciatok by

uplne stacilo, keby velacteny blogger napriklad linkami zdoraznil co su overitelne fakty a co jeho vlastne pocity.

 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

keď ťa čítam

tak mám také pocity, ako by som to.. no, že je zbytočné ti dávať nejaké linky
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

vdaka za diagnozu, u mna je ta citlivost na cervenu chronicka,

kam mam poslat dvadsat korun pan Dr. Vostep ?
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

máš 2 možnosti

- za dcvacku si daj teplú borovičku, a keď zaberie, tak porozmýšľaj čo má spoločné "citlivosť na červenú" s dobyvačnou vojnou v Iraku.
- druhá možnosť je, že tú dvacku pošleš tomu, kto má takisto ako ty "citlivosť na červenú" a asi to bude tvoj idol.
pošli to jemu. je to číslo 33515.
http://www.upn.gov.sk/regpro/zobraz.php?kniha=83&strana=74&zaznam=77315
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

Re: bm2

Co si ty za cloveka?
.
Veris viac americkej propagande ako vlastnym ociam a usiam? To ta Miki asi naucil.
.
Uz aj vyse 70 percent samotnych Americanov davno pochopilo to, co ty stale nechapes.
.
Vidno, ze ti chyba zrusena zakladna vojenska sluzba, ked uz nie ostre nasadenie do nejakej vojny. Tam by si sa posral, chlapce.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

bojim sa

ze v case ked som ja drel zelene sukno tvoj otec tahal kacera mily misox.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

hm

Pakistan by bol zaujimavejsi.
 
Hodnoť:   mínus indicator plus

boze tito negativisti

To znie akoby si kolegu Myslanova uz-uz mohol pochvalit a ty takto vytasis Pakistan.
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... > >>

Prihláste sa

(?)
 


Ďalšie možnosti
Zoznam diskusií

Registrácia
Zabudnuté heslo
Kódex diskutujúceho

Najčítanejšie na SME